I'm troubled by
Church leaders not speaking up about an underlying concern in the recent and
on-going controversy over President Obama's healthcare mandates that require
religious organizations to provide contraceptives and abortifacients against
their teachings and conscience. There's
plenty of reaction among Church leaders and religious freedom advocates to this
being an assault on the First Amendment and a threat to our religious
liberties. While I believe that there
are reasons to be concerned about these things, there's a more fundamental
issue that we don't seem to want to address: we did this.
At the core of the
Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius' defense of this mandate
is an argument that Christians in America have made possible. The basis of her argument divides the
activities of religious organizations into sacred and secular. In other words, the mandate distinguishes
religious activities such as worship, Bible teaching, and evangelism from
non-religious activities such as running hospitals, providing child care
services, and feeding the homeless. The
greater threat of the HHS mandate isn't forcing religious organizations into
acting against conscience, it's reinforcing the status quo of American Christianity. We Christians created the distinction between
being the Church and going to church.
Whether for good motives or bad, Sabelius is making use of what we
created.
We have avoided
challenging those who profess Christ to live their lives as fully committed
steward-servants of Jesus. Instead,
we've allowed (even encouraged) people to retain their lifestyles, world views,
and worldly habits while asking them to make a little room in their busy lives
for some religion. We've made going to
church (i.e., attending worship services and, maybe, a Bible study) an
acceptable standard for being a faithful Christian instead of calling on those
who would follow Jesus to be the Church by denying themselves, taking up their
crosses daily, and going after Him. The
very things that Sebelius describes as unrelated to religious expression are
the things that Jesus lists as evidences of a living faith (Matthew 25:34-36)
and the Bible describes as true religion (James 1:27). We can rant and rave about our government
officials acting as they are, but we've set the stage for this.
By all means we, as
citizens of the United States, should respond to this controversy in the public
forum and work to preserve our religious freedoms. But let's not let the Kingdom of the Left
issues overshadow the greater Kingdom of the Right opportunities. This should serve as a call for all
Christians to live out the Faith in such a way that it is clear to everyone who
we are in Christ. It is a wake up call
for us to refuse to be satisfied with going to church and to rededicate
ourselves to being the Church. After
all, the issue at hand shows us just how desperately our nation needs us to be
the Church.
I concur,and interject, ideals.
ReplyDelete"Equaity, liberty, popular sovereignty, the rights of man-these are not elements which we can see and touch. They are ideals. They have their source and their roots in religious convictions. They belong to the unseen world. Unless the faith of the American people in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration [of Independence] will perish. We cannot continue to enjoy the result if we neglect and abandon the cause.
Governments do not make ideals, but ideals make governments." Calvin Coolidge